Here's the conundrum. Read the following sentences aloud, and see if you need a comma:
- John is a Weston, Conn., native.
- Mr. Smith, the former Greeley, Colo., city manager, has a flower shop.
- Jane Jones has opened an office in Milford, Conn., representing clients in appeals cases.
- The Nov. 1, 2005, event went off without a hitch.
- He arrived on Nov. 1, 2005, and immediately began working at the firm.
The Associated Press Stylebook addresses these points in entries titled "state names" and "years," but it does not include the reasons behind the rules. George T. Arnold cites the same rule in the "Media Writer's Handbook: A Guide to Common Writing & Editing Problems," but like the AP, he provides no reasoning.
I tell my students that commas are necessary in each case because what follows modifies the preceding word or phrase. For instance, "Conn." explains where Weston is located, and "2005" describes the year in which the date occurred. If you take out the year or the state name, you do not need a comma. So the following would be correct:
- John is a Weston native.
- Mr. Smith, the former Greeley city manager, has a flower shop.
- The Nov. 1 event went off without a hitch.
- He arrived on Nov. 1 and immediately began working at the firm.
- Jane Jones has opened an office in Milford, where she represents clients in appeals cases.
1 comment:
Although the AP mandates their use, Garner and some other usage authorities question whether commas should be used in these descriptive situations where the city/state, etc. come before the noun.
So it is far from a hard-and-fast rule; it is merely a style decision.
Post a Comment