Then, why do so many scofflaws keep using “I” instead of “me”? Perhaps it’s because they were scolded as children for saying things like “Me want candy” instead of “I want candy,” so they began to think “I” was somehow more socially acceptable. Or maybe it’s because they were admonished against “it’s me.” Anybody who’s had “it is I” drummed into his head is likely to avoid “me” on principle, even when it’s right.Another mistake along the same lines occurs when people write "whom" instead of "who." I think writers do this because they think using "whom" makes one appear more learned. Like when people use big words that they don't understand, just to impress the readers. Not that my students ever do that.
I don't mind it when I hear these mistakes in spoken language. We simply don't have enough time to edit ourselves when we talk. It's when you make mistakes like these in writing that brings out the crank in cranky editors like me. I'm sure many will disagree. I have a friend who is an English professor, and she cannot stand to hear "can I" when "may I" is preferred. I can take it or leave it. Does that mean someone will come along and take away my "grammar junkie" card?
Now don't get me wrong. I can't stand to hear people say things like "I seen that" and "It don't make no difference to me." Double-negatives also give me the willies. One has to draw the line somewhere.
What makes you cranky?
3 comments:
There seems to be a trend here in the UK to say "I was sat..." instead of "I was sitting..." Grrr!
That is terrible, R2. I'm sorry for you.
Another trend I've spotted here in the UK - using 'myself' instead of 'me', perhaps because it is perceived to be more formal/polite.
For example: "Please complete the form, then return it to myself."
And regarding the 'I was sat' issue: http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.com/2006/09/exam-was-sat.html
Post a Comment